Tag Archive | "mining stocks"

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

More To Come From the Commodity Cycle

Posted on 25 September 2008 by Alex

The Reuters/Jefferies CRB Commodity Index is a commodity price index created in 1957 and currently made up of 19 commodities (petroleum products, base metals, agricultural products…). It has a critical role as a transparent and widely available benchmark for the performance of commodities as an asset class.

In our last update of August 13, the bearish technical indicators were arguing for a further move on the downside. At this time the CRB index was trading at 385, and the expected target for the correction pullback was 363, which was a key Fibonacci ratio. The price action eventually fell below this level as it posted a closing low price at 341 on September 16.

A strong rebound has already driven the Index back to 366, the closing price yesterday. Investors consider that the correction that occurs on the global commodities markets has been too strong in a relatively short-time frame. Despite the lower demand worldwide generated by a slowing economic growth, the financial credit crisis and the action plan decided by US authorities is likely to make the US Dollar plunge. That’s why, as a mechanical hedge against the decline of the Greenback, the commodities have bounced back sharply.

Three days ago (September 22), surging prices for oil, silver, soybeans and gold sent the CRB Index to its biggest gain in more than five decades.

All 19 commodities in the index gained. However the very next sessions should be choppy as the price action has just reached a first resistance line. This resistance is built by the lower high points (points C, D and now E) posted since the beginning of the retracement initiated in early July (point A).

http://www.moneymorning.com.au/images/20080925b.jpg
Click to Enlarge

Between A and B, the CRB fell by 28%. Despite the recent bounce back, the price action has failed to cross above the medium-term resistance line at 374, which also corresponds to the 23.6% Fibonacci ratio of the 2 months-and-a-half-decline, and to the 30-day moving average. There are consequently 3 good reasons for traders to sell back the CRB.

However the technical indicators have turned bullish therefore a further upside move is probable. The RSI showed that the CRB was clearly oversold, so did the Commodity Channel index that is now well oriented on the upside. The MACD has triggered a bullish signal last Friday.

If the current price development succeeds to clear the resistance level and to jump above 375, the next targets would probably be the next Fibonacci ratios, therefore 390 (38.2%) and 405 (50%).

Comments (3)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Resources Set to Boom… Again!

Posted on 24 September 2008 by Alex

Despite all the market excitement, some things never change. On Monday the Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics (ABARE) released its September quarter commodities report.

It further strengthens our reasoning for not caring about what happens in the US. Of course, if the US does go into a steep recession it will have an impact on global markets and economies. But the influence of the US is becoming less important as time goes on.

When we take a step back and look at what is happening in Asia and the rich Arab emirates in the Middle East it becomes even more apparent that Australia does not need to be too concerned about the US Congress taking on USD$700 billion of additional debt.

Why? Because it is all still ticking along nicely in the commodities markets.

For the most part anyway. There is the odd story floating around of capital raisings being postponed due to tighter credit markets, but they appear to be in the minority.

The report from ABARE tells us that although “world economic growth is assumed to decline from 5 per cent in 2007 to around 3.9 per cent in 2008 and 3.8 per cent in 2009″ Australia’s “commodity export earnings are forecast to increase to a record $214 billion in 2008-09.”

Australian Resources Exports to Increase by 48%
That represents an increase of 40% over the previous year. Even better than that is that energy and minerals exports are forecast to increase by 48% to $178 billion.

Putting those figures into perspective, the entire value of all exports for the year until May 2008 was $216 billion.

In other words, based on forecasts (which may or may not be reliable) the resources sector alone will export this amount alone.

And what market share does the United States contribute to our exports? Last year it totaled $10.3 billion, that’s less than half of what was exported to China. And only a third of the exports to Japan.

Look to Asia for Profit Growth
Compare the economic growth rates of the major OECD economies…

… with those in Asia.

We know things can change. And we also know that many of these Asian countries rely on the US as an export market. But increasingly, the new economies in Asia are growing to an extent that is making the ‘Old World’ economies less important.

Comments (0)

Tags: , , ,

Playing Both Sides of the Commodity Bull

Posted on 24 September 2008 by Alex

If you believe, like I do, that inflation is still very much embedded in the financial system then you must also adhere to hard assets, including gold. There’s absolutely no doubt in my mind that we’ll see much higher inflation as a result of this extravagant spending.

In my Commodity Trend Alert (CTA) service, we’ve recently raised our hedges against commodities. I anticipate tough markets for most of the sector until clearer signs emerge that the Fed has arrested deflation.

Still, I’m buying distressed oil companies and oil equipment stocks - and I’m buying oil right along side some of the best positioned global insiders. The energy sector remains the only segment of the marketplace heavily accompanied by net insider buying since prices began dropping in July.

Gold, which FDR confiscated in 1933, would probably rally in a deflationary economy. We got a taste of the huge gold rally to come when gold jumped over a US$100 last week after the AIG rescue.

Also, gold stocks haven’t been this cheap and bombed-out since 2005. In fact, the mining stocks trade at a seven-year low versus physical gold! You should be aggressively buying up this sector now.

Comments (0)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Markets Mixed

Posted on 18 September 2008 by Alex

 

American markets fell by up to 4.7% on the S&P 500, London was down, cash dried up around the world, our market could be down sharply at the open and Russia froze.

Overnight futures trading had our market opening more than 3% lower after the terrible day on Wall Street.

US interest rates hit their lowest level at the short end since 1941, according to some estimates.

The Dow closed down 4.1% at a three year low (but ONLY the second biggest fall of the year!).

It was another dramatic day of trading that swept world markets.

A UK bank was forced to find a safe home with a rival and now there’s reports the huge Morgan Stanley investment bank is looking to merge with the Wachovia bank, which has also suffered big losses from subprime released debt. 

Morgan Stanley had revealed a small, 3% drop in its latest quarterly profit, the best from a US bank for months, but that wasn’t enough.

Washington Mutual, the troubled US Savings and Loan was reportedly setting up a process to be sold. It has $US143 billion in retail deposits.

Gold jumped by more than $US87 an ounce to $US868, the biggest rise in nine years; oil rose $US6 a barrel to more than $97 a barrel as investors sought protection from stockmarkets.

US interest rates plunged, but in the commercial markets, there was no money available: 10 year bonds fell to 3.41% in New York dealing, the two year bond to a yield of 1.64%, but three month Treasury notes fell to a range of 0.40% to 0.70%, the lowest for decades. 

European markets were higher early, but slumped as banks were hammered. The US was down all day and Asian markets ended lower after early gains on the back of the US Federal rescue’s bailout of AIG.

But in London shares in HBOS (which owns BankWest here) fell more than 30% yesterday in early London trading amid concerns about its reliance on wholesale funding after Lehman Brothers’ collapse.

HBOS and Lloyds TSB later revealed they were in merger talks as the pressures grew on HBOS to be taken over of collapse. Talks saw agreement on a near $A25 billion merger of the two that seems to have official approval as a way of saving HBOS.

Russia injected $US44 billion into its markets, halted trading for a second day and gave several banks more time to repay previous cash advances.

But that wasn’t enough and trading on the stockmarket was later stopped for a third day, but it didn’t resume.

Russia was forced to close its two main stock exchanges to halt a rout that has led to the steepest declines since the August 1998 crisis.

The two key bourses, Micex and RTS, said they were suspending trading until further notice from the state’s main financial regulator after shares began to fall as a new wave of forced equity sales on margin calls consumed dealings and cash dried up.

Over $US700 billion in value has been wiped off Russian shares and it is the first stockmarket to freeze during the crisis, a situation reminiscent of the country’s default a decade ago last month.

US Government short term interest rates fell to near 66 year lows, short term interbank rates in London soared, and a drying up of finance for bond issues was reported across Europe and the US. Trans Atlantic lending was halted by a surge in spreads that made lending prohibitive.

The Financial Times headline said it all “Panic grips credit markets”.

HBOS is the UK’s largest mortgage lender and its shares have been hit since Lehman imploded, but they opened trading Wednesday in London up 10%, but then they fell sharply and reports emerged of the Lloyds’ talks.

Central banks in Japan and Australia injected $US33 billion into their financial systems to try to calm markets.

The Reserve Bank here pumped in more than $A4 billion in an injection that was of a similar size to those late last year as the credit crunch was erupting.

Asian financial shares fell as the bailout of American International Group failed to ease concerns that credit-related losses will cause more financial failures.

The US Securities and Exchange Commission banned naked short selling again (a bit late perhaps, after relaxing it a month ago after a month long ban).

In Australia, Macquarie Group fell more than 7% even after denying a newspaper report that the company may face difficulty in refinancing debt

It was a four year low for Macquarie.

Finance stocks weakened after CNBC reported that Morgan Stanley was considering seeking a merger partner. 

That saw some markets, like Australia’s turn and spreads on Morgan Stanley debt widen as investors fretted about another investment bank. 

Morgan Stanley had brought forward its latest quarterly earnings by a day and revealed a drop in profit of just 3%, the best by an American group for months.

Tokyo rebounded from Tuesday’s sell down: The Nikkei rose 1.2%. But China’s CSI 300 Index (which tracks yuan-denominated A shares listed on China’s two exchanges) dropped to a 21 month low.

It fell 3.6%, to 1,929.14 at the close, the lowest close since late December 2006. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index lost 2% after rising early.

In Australia shares ended a roller-coaster day in the red with the ASX200 index off 0.6%, or 28.6 points at 4722.2.

The market clawed back about one-third of its losses from Monday and Tuesday, banks fell in the early afternoon as worries resurfaced and that CNBC report was circulated about Morgan Stanley.

The Commonwealth Bank fell 1.5% to $41.08 and the National Australia Bank fell 2.3% to $21.40.

Falling oil and metals prices hit the miners. Rio Tinto fell 2.2% to $104.47 and BHP Billiton fell 0.3% to $36.28.

 

 

Comments (0)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Commodities: Oil Under $US100 A Barrel

Posted on 15 September 2008 by Alex

It sounds like more of the same from the past few weeks: sharemarkets rattled, financial stocks rattled and commodities on the slide. 

Well, it was up till Friday when it suddenly became a very different story.

And this morning, a switchback, with oil under the $US100 a barrel mark in New York trading early today as damage from Hurricane Ike wasn’t as bad as feared.

The US dollar fell Friday as the slide in the euro came to an end; the Australian dollar bounced a couple of cents; gold, copper and several other commodities rose and Hurricane Ike was the big influence.

But the big question was whether Friday’s bounce was due to Ike coming ashore and apparently not leaving too much damage to the oil and gas producing, refining and distribution facilities along the Texas coast between Houston and Galveston.

At least 13 refineries in Texas were shut for the passage of Ike.

That was 3.64 million barrels a day of refining capacity.

But as we have seen after storms in the past month, once the situation is clarified, then the prices of oil, petrol and gas will ease quite quickly.

And that’s what seems to have happened after Ike as oil fell in early electronic trading in new York to $US99.25 after dropping to $US98.75 a barrel early this morning, our time.

The October New York contract briefly dipped to $US99.99 on Friday, falling under the $US100 level for the first time since April 1.

But Nymex crude in New York rose 31c to close at $US101.18 a barrel.

In London, October Brent North Sea crude eased 6c to settle at $US97.58 a barrel.

Oil prices are down $US47.29 a barrel since the peak of $US147.47 on July 11.

For all the sound and fury of Ike, the real story remains the continuing dip in American consumption of oil-based energy products.

US energy consumption is down 3.8% over the past four weeks compared with the same period in 2007, while petrol consumption is down 2.1%.

 


On the Chicago grain markets, the emphasis is shifting as the harvest gets underway and the yields of wheat, corn, soybean and other crops becomes clearer.

The United States Department of Agriculture said on Friday that the hugely important corn harvest won’t be as big as thought because of widespread dry, warm weather last month.

The USDA said farmers will harvest 1.8% less corn than forecast last month, while the soybean harvest will be down 1.3%, but wheat output will be higher in both the US and globally.

The USDA forecasts steeper increases in corn and soybean prices, which have eased from the record levels set earlier in the year.

December corn rose 30 USc, or 5.6% on Friday to $US5.6325 a bushel in Chicago. That pushed prices up 2.7% this week. That left the price of the most active contract down 30% from the all time high of $US7.9925 in late June.

November soybean futures rose 26c, or 2.2%, to $US12.02 a bushel in Chicago. The price rose 2.1% last week. Beans are down 27% from the all time high of $US16.3675 hit in early July

The USDA said the average cash corn prices in the crop year that began September1 were $US5.50 a bushel, compared with $US5.40 estimated in August and $US4.20 in the most recent year.

The Department said cash soybean prices will average $US12.35 a bushel this crop year (which started on September 1), up from last month’s estimate of $US2.25 and up from $US10.15 in the previous year.

 


Wheat was the odd one out with prices falling for a third straight week after the USDA made no change in its estimate of US domestic stocks in the coming year, suggesting that there might be more grain than the market thought.

The USDA said it expects US carryover stocks on May 31 (the end of the wheat crop year) will be around 574 million bushels, while exports will total 1 billion bushels, matching the forecasts made in August by the USDA.

December wheat futures fell 7c to $US7.1925 a bushel on Friday, down 4.3% over the week and 19% this year.

The USDA also increased its estimate of global production to a record 676.3 million tonnes, up from last month’s forecast of 670.8 million tonnes.

Canadian farmers will harvest 25.4 million tonnes, up slightly from the August forecast of 25 million tonnes; European Union output will be 147.2 million tonnes, up from 143.2 million tonnes in the August forecast and these will offset declines in Australia and Argentina: Australia will produce 22 million tonnes, down from the 25 million tonnes in the August forecast and Argentina growers may harvest 12.5 million tonnes, 1 million tonnes down on the August estimate.

According to the USDA’s forecast, the US is expected to be the largest exporter of wheat, followed by Canada, Russia, Australia, Ukraine and Argentina.

 


Copper had its best week in three, rising sharply on Friday as the US dollar lost ground against the euro.

Comex December copper futures added 7.15 USc, or 2.3%, to $US3.194 a pound. The price was up 3.1% last week

The metal climbed from Wednesday-Friday, as signs of declining mine output increased concerns that supplies may be tight next year. Some analysts, especially at Citigroup, are forecasting demand to run ahead of production next year.

Copper was also supported Friday by a fall in Chinese stocks.

Stocks overseen by the Shanghai Futures Exchange dropped 29% to 13,554 tonnes, the lowest level since 2003.

On the London Metal Exchange, three month copper rose $US192, or 2.8%, to $US7,122 a tonne, or $US3.23 a pound.


Gold jumped Friday, ending a nine-day losing streak, thanks to the US dollar’s fall against the euro.

The euro rose as much as 1.5% against greenback, but ended off 0.3% for the week.

The Australian dollar finished at $US82.36 in New York, up from $US80.48 in Sydney on Friday afternoon and $US81.64 in Sydney the week before.

It was a rare gain for the currency, the first for a month or more over the week and the strongest daily performance for weeks.

Gold fell 4.8% over the week, despite a $US19 dollar an ounce rise on the day.

Comex December gold rose $US19, or 2.5% to $US764.50 an ounce in New York. The metal had fallen 11% from the end of August to last Thursday

Silver also had a rare rise, finishing up 24c, or 2.3%, to $US10.795 an ounce for the December contract. The metal still dropped 12% last week and is down 28% this year.

Gold is down 26% from the record $US1,033.90 reached in March and is off 8.8% in 2008.

 

 .

Comments (0)

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Chinese are Coming – Again

Posted on 25 August 2008 by Alex

Just when resources bears had convinced themselves that the China induced resources boom was over, and that the ending of the Olympics would symbolically reflect this, the Chinese have swept over the horizon to let everyone know that they are still here.

You may recall that back in February, Aluminum Corp. of China paid USD$14 billion for a 9% stake in Rio Tinto [ASX:RIO]. Although the shares were bought through Rio’s London listed shares and it was below the 15% threshold set for foreign ownership, Chinalco still went through the process of applying to the Foreign Investment Review Board for approval.

The Treasurer has now given the approval which means Chinalco can buy up to a 15% stake in Rio before it will need to go back to the FIRB.

It would seem likely that Chinalco will pursue taking a shareholding to that level, as there is minimal regulation on the UK side until its shareholding reaches 30% which would trigger a forced takeover bid for the whole of Rio. It’s questionable whether the Chinese have any interest in pursuing the matter that far, as it is more likely they are keen to be actively involved in the takeover discussions between BHP Billiton [ASX:BHP] and Rio, to perhaps gain some business concessions in return for supporting the takeover.

 takes a technical look at the Rio share price below

The stock (ASX:RIO) is still backed by a long-term bullish trend started in early 2007. It has posted low prices during this month of August but found this long-term support and has been bouncing back for 6 days now.

Despite a false break generated by the plunging equity markets one year ago when the subprime crisis blew up, the support line of the bullish trend remains valid. It means that over the long-term, the lows are posted higher. Therefore the slope typically illustrates an increasing price development.

From May 19, which is the historical high price, to August 13, RIO fell by 30%. The fact that the long-term support has been tested and validated twice recently argues for the end of this 30% decrease. The bearish trend is therefore completed. It is likely to open the way to a new bullish trend.

Chart: http://www.moneymorning.com.au/images/20080825a.jpg

The first bullish indicator is that the price action succeeded to breakout above its resistance line. This resistance line was built by the high prices posted during the 3-months decline (points C, D, E and F on the chart). Each time the price action failed to go higher as there was not enough momentum, not enough conviction from investors to jump further into the stock.

The perspective has changed now as this barrier has been cleared last week. This resistance line was also strengthened by the 40-day moving average which was plot just above and was also acting as a resistance. Last Friday RIO closed at $122.17, well above its 40-day moving average: it’s another bullish signal. The stock has therefore already rebounded by almost 11% since the low of August. There is more to come.

The technical indicators show that a further move on the upside is probable. The MACD has triggered a bullish signal as it has crossed above its signal line. So did the 21-day technical momentum indicator as it jumped above the 100 level. It means that some momentum is building and that more and more money is currently flying into the stock. Both increasing volume and price are creating this bullish momentum.

In this scenario, investors should pay attention to the retracement levels of the recent 3-months decline. Short-term traders may take profit around those levels. The Fibonacci ratios show that the 38.2% level corresponds to $128 and that the 50% level corresponds to $134. These are the first objectives for the current price action.

On the downside, a pull back towards the long-term support line might occur, but only a breakdown below this support level would be a new strong bearish signal.

Comments (0)

Tags: , , , , , , ,

4 Reasons PNA Looks Oversold

Posted on 22 August 2008 by Alex

Pan Australian resources (ASX:PNA) is a growing mining exploration and development company that has assets in Laos and Thailand.

The stock has experienced a bullish trend starting in September 2006. The price at this time was $0.25. It peaked in last April when a high was posted at $1.25. It climbed by 400% in roughly 20 months. The price action has corrected between April and last week, where it retraced 61.8% of the initial rise.

It has been hammered by the current downturn on the equity markets, as well as a lot of stocks that reach their low points or support levels. However there are always performing stocks in bearish markets, and there are a lot of opportunities for technical rebounds. PNA is likely to be one of those stocks.

Why is that?

Well, typically in this bearish market, our aim is to detect the stocks that have been massively sold with the mass, but that meet criteria that argue for a near-term bullish correction.

We look for end of oversold configurations, increasing volumes, strong support levels, and bullish signals from oscillators and momentum indicators.

PNA meets those criteria.


Click to Enlarge

  • The support level is the 61.8% retracement ratio of the 20-months bullish trend
  • The RSI shows that the oversold configuration is over. It has triggered a bullish signal when it crossed above 30. So does the Money Flow Index (MFI)
  • The Volume Oscillator is climbing
  • The MACD has triggered a bullish signal on August 15 after it bottomed, turned upward and crossed above its signal line

A new low price has been posted on August 13, at $0.60 (point C on the chart). One week later, it closed at $0.73. It’s almost a 22% rise. With the indicators turning bullish, there is more to come. The price objective for a further move on the upside is $0.94. A rebound to this level would be indeed a correction of half of the recent decline (between points B and C). It would also correspond to a previous low that is set at crossroads of the two support lines of the previous bullish (from points A to B) and bearish (from point B to point C) trends.

Comments (0)

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Will QGC Bid Hit Origin Bid?

Posted on 21 August 2008 by Alex

 

Will this deal kill BG Group’s multi-billion bid for Origin Energy?

BG Group has launched a hostile $13.7 billion takeover for Origin Energy Ltd, in part to secure its gas resources in eastern Australia.

Origin has rejected that offer and is looking for a partner for its coal seam gas reserves in Queensland.

BG Group owns 9.9% of Queensland Gas, can go higher by spending more proving up reserves, and will partner the company in an export LNG project in Gladstone.

Now QGC has moved on a Queensland competitor, the second in two months. It had already launched a bid for Roma Petroleum NL to expand its coal seam gas acreage in the Surat Basin.

And yesterday QGC went into a trading halt after announcing it could soon announce an agreed transaction.

That emerged yesterday afternoon as an agreed offer to buy Sunshine Gas for at least $837 million to add its reserves to those it is developing for the export LNG plant with BG.

QGC is offering five shares for every eight Sunshine Gas shares, or $1.65 in cash per share plus two shares for every seven shares in Sunshine, which is recommending the offer to shareholders.

The all-scrip offer values Sunshine at $2.70 a share, while the cash and scrip offer values it at $2.88. Sunshine Gas closed Tuesday at $2.20 before being halted from trading yesterday morning.

Queensland Gas shares closed at $4.32 and Origin shares fell 13 cents to $15.97.

QGC and BG Group say they will spend upwards of $8 billion on the LNG plant at Gladstone in central Queensland, plus tens of millions of dollars more on proving up the necessary reserves.

Sunshine Gas has an alliance with Japan’s Sojitz Corp and is one of four other consortiums proposing an LNG development utilising coal seam gas as feed in Queensland (one of the others, Santos, sold a 40% interest in its planned LNG plant and reserves to Petronas of Malaysia for $US2 billion, a deal that helped sink BG’s first attempt to buy Origin).

“QGC can increase its financial returns by supplying additional CSG (coal seam gas) to the Gladstone-based plant, which will have potential capacity of three liquefied natural gas (LNG) production trains totalling up to 12 million tonnes a year of LNG,” managing director Richard Cottee said in a statement.

He said the bid was furthering QGC’s fundamental strategy to grow into a leading supplier of gas-fired electricity in the domestic market. Enlarged reserves will produce more gas, and more effective gas competition, for the domestic market;

This, he said in the statement, would be done by: 

Providing access to fully develop a larger portfolio of exploration and production permits across Queensland’s premier gas basins;

Ensuring independent certified reserves and production for new projects in addition to those covered by agreements with BG Group, QGC’s Queensland Curtis LNG partner ;

Developing an expanded resource base to support an accelerated multi-train LNG project with ensuing capital and operating synergies.

That would indicate he sees no possible problems for the BG relationship in the deal, and lots of upside as it will be cheaper to get the required reserves for the LBG project by buying them, rather than finding them.

But from an announcement by the ACCC this week, BG is looking to distance itself from QGC to try and get its Origin offer over the line.

The Commission said it will conduct market inquiries on undertakings that have been offered by BG Group to address competition concerns arising from BG’s proposed acquisition of Origin Energy Limited.

“The undertakings propose that BG would unwind joint marketing arrangements between BG and Queensland Gas Company for the supply of gas to domestic wholesale customers in southern Queensland.

“The undertakings also contemplate that BG will relinquish its current right to appoint a director to the board of QGC and restructure arrangements between BG and QGC in relation to the exchange of commercially sensitive information, such that BG will not seek or obtain information in relation to the terms on which QGC supplies gas to domestic wholesale customers in southern Queensland.”

If that’s the case, the relationship in the LNG project might be questioned because the purchase price for the gas supplied to the project will be crucial, especially when compared to what other gas users were paying.

Sunshine Gas is a nice target: “Sunshine has established independently certified gas reserves at its 100 per cent-owned Lacerta CSG project near Roma and has extensive acreage with considerable exploration potential,” Sunshine Gas managing director Tony Gilby said in a statement to the ASX.

And to cement the chances of its offer getting up, QGC has entered into a pre-bid acceptance with Sunshine Gas for 15% of the latter’s shares.

BG has bid $15.50 for Origin and depending on its level of ownership and involvement in the QGC gas plant project; it might be able to still continue the deal.

QGC’s shares component of the offer will water down the 9.9% current stake of QGC, but also the 27% stake held by AGL Energy, which has so far not made any sort of move in the play. It seems to be holding on to its stake to make sure it has plentiful supplies of gas for its Southeast Queensland consumer and industrial users.

So the purchase of Sunshine Gas might not necessarily see a tightening of BG’s group on QGC or on its gas reserves. 

But it will control half the end use for much of that gas in its deal with the gas plant which now seems to be heading towards three trains instead of the original one to two.

Origin rejected BG’s bid in its target statement this week.

“Your directors believe BG’s offer undervalues Origin’s existing business and outstanding prospects and therefore recommend that you unanimously reject BG’s offer,” Australia’s second biggest energy retailer said in a release posted to shareholders on Tuesday.

Origin said it planned to provide shareholders with an independent valuation report containing “all relevant information about Origin’s value and prospects” before BG’s offer closes on September 26.

“Origin is a strongly performing, Australian integrated energy company with an impressive track record of growth,” Origin chairman Kevin McCann said in the statement.

“Origin has developed the leading position in Coal Seam Gas (CSG) in Australia and the strength of this position will be a key driver for continuing growth.”

He said the company had short-listed a number of global partners interested in accelerating development of the CSG reserves.

BG took its offer hostile in June when it got nowhere with Origin in talks.

“Origin has rejected BG Group’s offer but has comprehensively failed to justify its position,” BG chief executive Frank Chapman said in a statement replying to the Origin rejection. We remain confident that our offer represents full and fair value for Origin’s shareholders.”

He added that the Australian firm had supplied no “forecast or other financial information which could assist shareholders in valuing the company and making a timely and informed decision.”

The question is now whether QGC has made it harder for BG to move on Origin, or whether it is still game on.

Comments (0)

Tags: , , , , , ,

Miners: Nearly There, Nearly There…

Posted on 11 August 2008 by Alex

Last Friday the S&P/ASX 200 Metals and Mining index closed at 4,515.70. That’s 27% less than 3 months ago.

Until recently, as you know, the Index was on a long-term bullish trend. It started in March 2007 and was the backbone for regular rebounds after price falls. Despite a quick, false break on January 21 (point E), this support has been then tested and validated several times during the last 20 months (points A, B, C, and D on the chart).

But support broke on July 17.

That gives a fresh impulse to the bearish momentum. So we think the metals sector is going to get cheaper. Maybe you can start thinking about averaging down any entry prices for this sector in the next month or so. But we don’t think the bottom is in yet.

And as a result of the break, that grand old support immediately became a new resistance line. Two rebounds have already failed to clear it. Expect a further move downward before finding a new support baseline for a potential consolidation phase.

Aha. But here’s the fun part. Where’s that baseline going to kick in?

The indicators certainly aren’t bullish yet. The moving average crossovers configuration is still bearish for the near-term. The 10-day MA is moving well below the 30-day MA.

And the 14-day Relative Strength Index shows that the Index isn’t oversold yet either.

But we have no support line to go on anymore either. So if I were a trader (I am), and I had no support line to work with (I don’t)…what would I look for?

A key price level. Specifically, a previous high. Check out that graph again. There’s a key point at around 3,950 points.

This previous high was posted in March 2007 (point X). Once cleared, it became an immediate support point a few weeks later (point Y). This is also where the price rebounded in August last year (point B).

So…traders and investors…get your favourite mining ideas in order. The index isn’t quite there yet. But look for a bounce from that mark. It should get there in the next month or two.

Comments (1)

Advertise Here
Advertise Here

AD